Wednesday, January 17, 2018
How to best learn music fast
Some weeks ago, in an attack of hubris, I said yes to joining a big band as their new guitarist. It has been a while since I had to read music. Honestly, I have, since a short theatre gig in 1986, not had to have paper in front of me much while playing. I know all the 1845 chords that need to be handled in a gig with the big band, but there are passages, for instance when Cherokee is played at 300 km/h, that I have to learn by heart. My preferred method of rehearsing this is to copy sound files (they gave me the sheets and mp3 of all songs) into Ableton Live, and loop especially difficult passages in order to play them over and over again until I can play along. The sequence is: first reading the passage, singing and playing it slowly, then turning to Live to play along. It works in a way, but I feel there might be a better way.
Tuesday, April 25, 2017
They are all alike
A friend and fellow musician through many years turned famous composer called. We were going to meet for beers that evening but since he was travelling to meetings in another country early the next day we agreed to postpone. I was already planning to go to a concert at the new date he suggested, but even if he signalled some scepticism he volunteered to accompany me to the event before beers. His scepticism was founded on his view that all artist in the genre of the planned concert sounded alike. Even if my loss of impulse control often makes me agree strongly with the last speaker, this time I managed not to comment or condone. For a long time, I have had the conviction that the reason for so many of my old music friends to develop strong, often fiendish, views of other music than their own stems from the simple fact that we are getting old and stiff-brained. However, this particular friend is not of the growing-old type. I know him as an admirably open-minded person that can apply his music interest to almost all kinds of music. Of course, there are limits also for him. Lately, I have developed the hypothesis that our tendency to write off other artists and musics simply has to do with an instinctive urge to survive. For every year we live the world expands. New trends evolve while the old ones simply refuse to die. In order for us to be able to do more than staying oriented it is necessary to discard of something. Pick a sizable chunk, preferably something there is a lot of, and that many people seem to show interest for, and simply write it all of together with all the style's performers. Of course, if asked directly, I guess all my music friends, many of who are highly educated and employed in teaching music or art students at the highest level, would agree to the principle that a genre that is bad from start to the end does not exist. There are good and bad contemporary art music as there is country, jazz and noise. Putting this principle into work whenever some music hits your ears is however very tiring. A much simpler solution is to say that country, disco or whichever music simple is bad music.
Thursday, March 31, 2016
this view
she took his hand before he hit the traffic
he walks like a king and talks like napoleon
he keeps her alive and half dead from exhaustion
he’s a rollercoaster and royal entertainment
while she dreads the moment she will put the fish on the table
while they mount the stand where i could buy a leaner body
not for me as i sipped my dry cider on the other side of the street
remembering how old i have become
few of these people are history
no mooring of crying kids/blinding love/the cold hand of a dying mother
so good/sad/funny/half forgotten
Monday, May 11, 2015
Rehearsing Mugetuft
Yesterday we started rehearsing for
a new show. As usual, we started from scratch. That is, since we got the gig,
we have been collecting video, photos and sounds in order to use as raw
material. Without that it would not have been Mugetuft. Even if the project has
grown since Peter Knudsen and myself played our first duo guitar-projector gig
three years ago, we still maintain the core idea; that the visual and the
audial side of our final expression should be of as equal value as
possible.
June 14 at 11 pm, we are to perform
a half hour long piece at the front wall of an old workshop building at the
waterfront in the center of Oslo. As it looks now, the show will be a loosely
told "story" about life when this shop-dine-and-cappuccino part of
modern Oslo was still a big loud shipyard. However, at the core of all we do is
improvisation. It is pre-meditated to various extent, but improvised in timing
and what pieces of expression is used when, or not used at all.
Thursday, March 19, 2015
Some is more music than other, some is freer than other.
To say to a musician that what he or she plays is only almost music, can be perceived as an animosity. When I suggest that some free improvised music is more music than other, it is however not an attempt to alienate anyone, not least since some of the music i play and release myself can be said to fall into the "almost music" category.
To say that some improv is freer than other improv is also problematic, but maybe not so controversial, so let me start there.
This post is yet another of an endless row of attempts to find out what is what. Please bare with me.
I recently went to a concert here in Oslo with a British group (Watts / Weston / Lash / Day). It was great. If I was tell the musicians what I thought; that is sounded great, but that I did not find the set in any way provokingly rebellious they would probably find it ok and give me the only good answer to such a stupid remark. We play what we are and what we hear.
Never the less: This group is a part of a tradition in jazz music where every stretch (or tune) can be said to be a mimicking of when (if) the same group plays a composed tune with improvised parts (choruses). It did not sound as if they only played free versions of the chorus parts of those imagined tunes. It sounded, from the start to the finish of each stretch that they played tunes with heads, choruses and codas. It was great, but a comparative study of this group and Brötzmanns At Fresnes (with Kondo / Pupillo / Nilssen-Love) from 2009 would be interesting. Where At Fresnes is much more aggressive, sometimes almost one-dimensional, Watts / Weston / Lash / Day is sober and lyrical. In my ears and head the latter can be said to be less free than Fresnes is. Not that there is anything wrong with that.
Watts / Weston / Lash / Day is music. Even a person who only listenes to classical music from before 1910 will hear the almost romantic approach the group takes. This is not only because the "mimic" the playing of jazz tunes, but also because their approach is so lyrical and "romantic" sonically and energetically.
At Fresnes is also (and only) music in my ears. Fewer people will however find it pleasant. Those of us who woke up musically to rock music will not have any problems relating to the long set (no tunes here, only a log stretch).
But there are other groups that fall into the improv field that explore the bordes of the term music with their playing. Two words here: noise and sound art.
Noise music has been around for decades. Even if the term itself places it inside the music idiom, it is undoubtably a revolt against music that still provokes many music lovers. ( In our time it is a blessing to be able to appreciate Marhaug and Mahler equally well.)
Another interesting attempt to enlarge the field of music is the mixture of free improvisation and sound art. One example is the band Lab Field that elevates soundscapes to an "instrument". The effect is striking. It does good to listen to it without thinking much. But since all music is in a certain sense problematic, it can also give food for thought (and endless attempts to find out what is what).
To say that some improv is freer than other improv is also problematic, but maybe not so controversial, so let me start there.
This post is yet another of an endless row of attempts to find out what is what. Please bare with me.
I recently went to a concert here in Oslo with a British group (Watts / Weston / Lash / Day). It was great. If I was tell the musicians what I thought; that is sounded great, but that I did not find the set in any way provokingly rebellious they would probably find it ok and give me the only good answer to such a stupid remark. We play what we are and what we hear.
Never the less: This group is a part of a tradition in jazz music where every stretch (or tune) can be said to be a mimicking of when (if) the same group plays a composed tune with improvised parts (choruses). It did not sound as if they only played free versions of the chorus parts of those imagined tunes. It sounded, from the start to the finish of each stretch that they played tunes with heads, choruses and codas. It was great, but a comparative study of this group and Brötzmanns At Fresnes (with Kondo / Pupillo / Nilssen-Love) from 2009 would be interesting. Where At Fresnes is much more aggressive, sometimes almost one-dimensional, Watts / Weston / Lash / Day is sober and lyrical. In my ears and head the latter can be said to be less free than Fresnes is. Not that there is anything wrong with that.
Watts / Weston / Lash / Day is music. Even a person who only listenes to classical music from before 1910 will hear the almost romantic approach the group takes. This is not only because the "mimic" the playing of jazz tunes, but also because their approach is so lyrical and "romantic" sonically and energetically.
At Fresnes is also (and only) music in my ears. Fewer people will however find it pleasant. Those of us who woke up musically to rock music will not have any problems relating to the long set (no tunes here, only a log stretch).
But there are other groups that fall into the improv field that explore the bordes of the term music with their playing. Two words here: noise and sound art.
Noise music has been around for decades. Even if the term itself places it inside the music idiom, it is undoubtably a revolt against music that still provokes many music lovers. ( In our time it is a blessing to be able to appreciate Marhaug and Mahler equally well.)
Another interesting attempt to enlarge the field of music is the mixture of free improvisation and sound art. One example is the band Lab Field that elevates soundscapes to an "instrument". The effect is striking. It does good to listen to it without thinking much. But since all music is in a certain sense problematic, it can also give food for thought (and endless attempts to find out what is what).
To catch the wind
Improvisation
The art of musical improvisation is hard to define. First: is it an art form? Since it is an important element in so many different forms or styles of contemporary music, it is maybe not right to say it is an art form as such. That does not make it less important. It can be argued that improvisation is the basis of all kinds of music making and performing since the beginning of time. In a sense it lies behind and is the starting point of all music, however composed, calculated or cerebral it may sound. Improvisation has always had a big role to play in traditional music, up until the romantic phase of the music history it was a natural part of any music piece and of course it created the fundament of the development of blues and jazz. In our time it is highly present, as well as highly esteemed, in jazz as well as styles of contemporary art music and some rock styles.
However, since the 1960ties improvisation has also been elevated to being the aim itself in some styles. These styles can be divided into two: free jazz and contemporary improv.
1) Free jazz grows out of the “artification” of the 1950-ties jazz in the USA. The most important actor in this development, often named the inventor of the style, was the sax player Ornette Coleman.
2) Contemporary improv can be said to have grown out of the performance scene of the avant garde movement of the same period. To a great extent contemporary improv also generated from the USA but soon spread elsewhere.
3) Gradually we see other improv styles growing out of also other established music forms. Country music is one example. Improvisation that borders to sound art is another.
The development of the three styles detailed above make it possible today to name improvisation as an art form and a music style in its own right.
In the later years, the part of my musicing that can be named improvisation, has evolved from free jazz in the direction of more contemporary/art music influenced forms of expression as noise, soundscape and not least electronics.
What happens during an improvisation?
Measured in decibels: sometimes very much, other times very little. There are different ways to approach an free improv session. The full-force approach is the punk of improv. It is loud and the “arrangement” of an improvised stretch, meaning who plays when, is intentionally very crowded. The result is that everyone plays hard, loud and all through the tune, sometimes during the complete concert. In other music styles this is often considered as a result of bad listening. In this context it is an intentional result of making music that tries to talk directly to the body by not being calculated or brainy in any way. Other times the aim is to explore the quality of improvisation of single notes or simple atmospheres. This is often done by playing very sparsely and by trying to avoid disturbing another musician’s improvising with ideas that conflicts too much. Often this last approach will follow an almost “romantic” pattern where one instrument sets the theme in a quiet way and the others follow by adding or (carefully) contrasting. Sometimes this will end up in an atmosphere of ambient qualities, other times elements of beat can be added.
The few (there are more alternatives) descriptions above indicate how an improvised performance can develop in a number of different ways. Often the improvisation can start from an ambition to create the impression of a composed piece. Some improvising ensembles, be it in free jazz or free art music, tend to mimic a piece from the tradition they came from when they improvise a piece.
In these cases one is reminded about the discussion about non-idiomatic improvisation. While it may be impossible to free the art of improvisation from musical idioms, the attempt to do so is in my view a strong and fruitful artistic aim. It is my tradition(s), compositions, listening experience and playing experience that creates the basis of what I play. Hence, I cannot escape tradition(s) that created me. On the other hand, the art of improvisation must revolt against those traditions to be successful. It is not hard to point to cultural trends preceding the hippies of the 1960-ties, but the hippie movement would not be as important as it became if it did not successfully revolt against the cultures it grew out of.
Enrica: What freedom is built in a improvisation?
Freedom from time and traditional accuracy. Most young musicians are schooled in traditions where accuracy were the measurement dividing good from bad. Growing up, meeting the option of improvisation can give a tremendous experience of freedom. The yearly held RARA festival of improvised music on Sicily is an example of how strong the improvised scene in Europe has become. There 20 musicians from all over the world gather in order to play together. Most of the concerts are free improvised and most of the ensembles are put together by the curator of the festival, Alessandro Vicard. The result is groups where people who often never have played together must find a common path through a set. Often a group can be heard to reflect styles from free jazz, noise, ambient and free art music. When successful a set of highly inspired improvisation on a high level can be created.
Enrica: What rules are applied?
There are rules and there are no rules. Let me give you an example. One main rule of improvised music is that it has to be music of the moment. In other words: you do not bring written music, you avoid pre recorded samples and you create the energy by listening to the other players as hard as you can.
But it would not be improvisation if such rules were not challenged. There is no sense in trying to draw clear lines between styles in any art form. When it comes to improvised music, the variations are limitless. I have recently started a project with the Swedish bassist Anders Berg that has resulted in several digital releases. Our recordings contain us playing our instruments, electronic manipulations of these instruments, radio soundscapes, passages of recordings from other projects that date often years back as well as pure computer generated sounds. But when you listen to it if feels natural to label it improvised music. Maybe sometime in the future those labels become obsolete.
Enrica: I care especially the look “legal" of the creative (wrongly, improvisation is considered free from all constraints)
In my view, as explained above, “free from all constraints does not exist”. The freedom is relative to something. It relates to earlier music, musicing and other impressions. In a certain sense “free from all constraint” or even “non-idiomatic improvisation” are themselves aesthetic concepts that the musician who tries to practice them must live up to or relate to.
In my head improvised music is a form of “stretching”. We start from what we are, what we played and what we listened to and dig and we comment it, sometimes so thoroughly that it is turned inside out.
At some point, practitioners of the art of free improvisation start commenting the idioms of free improvisation itself, and things start to become really interesting.
Wherever the development of improvisation is heading, I feel it has an important mission. It opens rooms in established styles of music, it opens the minds of the players and not least it can open the mind of the listener.
I have a friend who cannot live without music. But the music he listens to is narrative music, tunes with a singer singing a song with an obvious meaning. His music is there to make it easy to listen to the singer. At a whole, the music leads the listener pleasantly through the next four minutes. Being my friend and a curious social scientist he wants to understand the music I play. I tried to explain, but he still could not get anything out of listening to it. Not before I understood that he needed other listening methods than he uses when he listens to the artists he loves (and grew up with). He took my listening lessons quite serious. After a while he came back with a “I have no way to explain your music, Tellef, but at least you have taught me to listen to it. I think the key was not to look for one common timeline in a piece, but in stead treat it as a condition or sometimes a soundscape that surrounds you”.
Monday, January 26, 2015
Anatomy of a file-exchange album
Over the last months, I have engaged in a frantic file-exchange activity with Swedish bass player Anders Berg. The result has been 3 Bandcamp albums titled November, December and January. This process itself has given me food for some thought about the nature of improvised music: What is it? How free is it, really? Does it have a role to play in the music(s) of our time? What happened to melody? Can it be groovy? Do you need to be in the same room? How long should an improvised concert or album be? Will classically trained improvisors take over improvised music from jazz musicians? What will then become of free jazz?
These are not new thoughts. And they are relevant for many sorts of musicing outside the realm of free impro. Actually, that could be one answer to the question if impro should be banned. Its non-compromising nature can be a catalyst for questions about music itself, be it machined dance music or a gavotte.
Our duo's overall plan is to have no plan. One of us starts the recorder, plays a stretch over a number of minutes, and sends it over the border to the other player. Anders seldom listens to what he has recorded before he sends his stuff over to me. I usually play it back and sometimes replace it. That might be heresy, but it is what it is. In another group I play in our practise before performances ends up in a plan for a 3 or 4 sequence show where each segment has a signature sound or atmosphere. Still it is free music. But to call it completely free from idioms or each musician's background (or bag) would be false.
My collaboration with Anders Berg has so far resulted in 3 releases in 3 months
Go to:
simlas.bandcamp.com/album/november
simlas.bandcamp.com/album/december
simlas.bandcamp.com/album/january-2
These are not new thoughts. And they are relevant for many sorts of musicing outside the realm of free impro. Actually, that could be one answer to the question if impro should be banned. Its non-compromising nature can be a catalyst for questions about music itself, be it machined dance music or a gavotte.
Our duo's overall plan is to have no plan. One of us starts the recorder, plays a stretch over a number of minutes, and sends it over the border to the other player. Anders seldom listens to what he has recorded before he sends his stuff over to me. I usually play it back and sometimes replace it. That might be heresy, but it is what it is. In another group I play in our practise before performances ends up in a plan for a 3 or 4 sequence show where each segment has a signature sound or atmosphere. Still it is free music. But to call it completely free from idioms or each musician's background (or bag) would be false.
My collaboration with Anders Berg has so far resulted in 3 releases in 3 months
Go to:
simlas.bandcamp.com/album/november
simlas.bandcamp.com/album/december
simlas.bandcamp.com/album/january-2
Sketch from 2008
the drive from berkeley to santa cruz took us around 90 minutes. as my friend oivind, always the well oriented, already knew his way around town from earlier visits and I had directions to Rick Walkers house on my cell phone, it wasnt to hard to find Rick Walkers house. When we got there Rick was mounting some effects into a rack with the rack placed on his work bench, a very old, big and rusty american car. As he was running a bit late for our improv session at Meta Records downtown he asked us to take a look around inside the house. Rick's house is a dream for any musician, and can be turned into a theme park for imagination and improvisation any time. Before we had had time to check out more than a very little part of his collection, Rick was ready. I packed the Fender Strat I was to borrow into a gig bag and off we drove to the main street. The Meta Records store is a small nice place filled with vinyl records. Rick put up is stuff in the corner, went one more trip back home to get some more, and was almost ready by the time people had gathered around him to listen. He gave us a set with the most varied and imaginative collection of instruments and sounds. This man is a true sorcerer of sound and colourful pvc. I went on an hour later and did a short stretch alone before Rick seamlessly made his way into my playing. We played for another half hour.
It became an evening i shall never forget. In may, Rick goes to Europe, and when he reaches the shores of scandinavia we will meet again to play. looking forward to that greatly!
Monday, March 06, 2006
paal nilsen-love for president!
no role has been more important for the developement of popular or rhythmic music the last decades than that of the humble back man - the drummer. my personal favorites: mitch mithcell, ginger baker, jon christensen, jack de johnette, brian blade, tony williams. Up in cold Norway there is this drummer called paal nilsen-love http://www.paalnilssen-love.com/ who takes up this noble tradition and adds his own amazing talent. the result can be heard for instance at several recordings with a fantastic band called atomic. please check him out. when pat metheney played in norway a couple of years ago he was quoted in an interview saying exactly what is in the title for this entry: paal nilsen-love for president!
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
old lps come to life again
paul motians record "psalm" had sat in my basement for 15 years together with a couple of hundred other lps. the house i live in has no room for the turntable. the other day i thought i had found the solution. a box labelled terratec arrived in the mail containing a small box that could digitalize as well as amplifie the signal from a turntable in such a way that my computer would accept the music. the a-d box was nice, but the software just wouldnt start. i gave it up and downloaded something called lprecord in stead. took me the best of 2 days but at least 3 records made it to my cd player. the records were: the mentioned motian recording, keith jarrets bop be from 1978 and a record by the flutist hariprasad charusia made in india in 1968. not many, but a good start. i love to let the old memories flow almost as much as i love the sound of the pick up entering the vinyl groove. of course i did not edit that away. would you?
Tuesday, February 07, 2006
unmusical
this is the us state departments views on the ongoing cartoon debate: ""Anti-Muslim images are as unacceptable as anti-Semitic images, as anti-Christian images, or any other religious belief." this statement from the country that we often hear is the great defender of freedom and democracy shows how hollow such an image is. this shows us how full of bad thinkers and sloppy democrats the bush administration is. this is what they say about this crisis? and what exactly does "unacceptable" mean in this context. that we should ban it? that the cartoonists should not be allowed to treat jesus, muhammad and god with satire? and this is the country that fights for the values of the free world around the globe. my GOD
Thursday, February 02, 2006
back in the 1960ties Semie Moseley built a guitar he called Mosrite Ventures. Yesterday, 50 years later, I had the oportunity to try one for the first time. A friend down the street had bought one from Califorinia and at last it arrived after a long journey over the ocean. The guitar is full of history. The design is strange, and judging from its bruises and scratches it has been played a lot. It is a bit big and heavy, but very vell balanced. It did not feel like a strange new thing but like a guitar I had played many times before. Actually it felt much better holding and playing it than my own ESP Telecaster. The sound is open and has a singing quality to it. An open C chord sounds great and single notes high up on the E-string when played through a clean amp sings better than most guitars at any guitar store. The frets are very low and invite more to legato playing than string bending. Go here http://www.modernguitars.com/archives/000231.html to read the history behind the Mosrite.
Tuesday, January 31, 2006
composition is improvisation
in reality there is no real difference between improvisation and composition. it is our need to understand the world around us and our lives in it that establishes these 2 classes. but they are really only true in language. in fact all music is improvised. when a composer writes a piece of music she is improvising in the most profound meaning of the word. when a so called free improviser improvises he grabs themes and expressions from his "vocabulary" and interprets them there and then. some people believe that they are playing something they call "non idiomatic improvisation", but such does not exist. the idioms are all around and inside us. the fact that you feel your music does not fit into any of the shelves in your local cd store does not mean that your music is freer. very few musicians feel that they fit in to categories. but all of us play on what we carry in our own musical "bag".
best
ivaranz
best
ivaranz
Thursday, January 26, 2006
the life school of football
millons love football (some places called soccer). others hate it. i know many of both categories. the "haters" hate football because they feel it is taking over completely and thus pressing other important cultural expressions out of the picture. the effect is not least that it takes all the money. even if it rightly can be said that football is overpaid superstars, our times most visible defiance of art and tradional culture expressions AND a good dose of cheating (anyone remembering Rivaldos filming at the corner flag some years ago and new about rigged matches?) football is more. at the positive side of the matter is not least the fact that this sport teaches children the power of working together and what great effect your support of your friend, colleagues and family can have in daily life. in my experience: when they reach 12/14 years of age the young players start to understand that what is needed to win is the ability to work together. and when the goal keeper lets an easy ball pass him into the net they will at this age experience what effect it has if you tell him "no, stop doing that. you always let easy balls into the net you bad keeper". the effect is a worse keeper. if you in stead chose to give him constructive advice and remind him of how good he was in the last match, you get a better keeper. in order to learn these very important life lessons you need to pass from child to youngster, but you need something else as well: you need peace from over ambitious fathers with wounds on their souls from broken football amibtions back in their own adolesence.
best, ivaranz
best, ivaranz
Tuesday, January 24, 2006
how flashy is comunication death?
a good friend of mine is also a very active musician and composer. he also has his own record label where he releases his own as well as other creative musicians music. and of course he has his own web site. the only problem is that some months ago he was talked into switching to a much more elegant design by way of macromedia flash. today he sent me an email saying that he could not show me his latest mp3 because his f**** web site does not allow him to upload music himself. he has to get hold of the designer first and he is off studying in scotland or somewhere. this sucks. the web is fantastic beacause of 2 things. first, it is available anywhere whenever you are anywhere. second, because it enables every body to be a publisher and not least because the reader, listener, user can talk back. now, because of this elegant tool, this very creative and active artist can no longer communicate in real time with his fans. if he had had a simple html site he would not have this problem. anyone for a solution (that does not demand of him to go off somewhere to become a macromedia engineer)?
best
ivaranz
best
ivaranz
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)